A Climate Declaration
Ideas & Events For Rescuing Our Earth

Maybe Climate Protesting That Disrupts Traffic Is Too Extreme. Torching Refineries Makes More Sense.

OTHER WEBSITES
5 Minutes to Save the Earth

Podcast

Group

Maybe Climate Protesting That Disrupts Traffic Is Too Extreme. Torching Refineries Makes More Sense.

Photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on Unsplash

In sentencing a quartet of protesters for blocking highway traffic for several hours, a judge in U.K. acknowledged that protest has a long and honorable history in that country. However, this cannot justify inconveniencing thousands of commuters.

I believe Judge Silas Reid has a valid point. The 10,000 commuters who, in October 2021, found themselves blocked on the M4 near Heathrow were not responsible for the climate crisis. Well, maybe a little responsible — they were burning gasoline and emitting C02 while driving 2 ton vehicles to get their 150 pound bodies (or should I say 68 kilos?) to the airport or to work.

Nonetheless, that’s quite an annoyance for people who are small players while, say, British Petroleum goes about its Earth-shattering business unimpeded.

Based on Judge Reid’s perfectly sensible reasoning, it seems clear to me that protesters would be better served by, say, torching a BP refinery or slicing through a natural gas pipeline. This would protect the relatively blameless British commuter, and instead cause difficulties for the climate abusing corporations — those who pose a mortal threat to every man, woman, child and animal on this planet.

If we compare the relative severity of these crimes — inconveniencing commuters for two hours vs. dooming billions of people along with many, many other living creatures…well, if those who were being a nuisance to commuters were sentenced to 5 weeks in prison (as they were), what would be a fair punishment for the mass-murdering climate abusers who run British Petroleum?

0 Comments

Share This